Invitation-only private auctions — where selected billionaires are discreetly invited to bid on absurdly expensive old canvases — are booming.
Why?
Because the
ultra-wealthy apparently prefer buying cultural credibility without the inconvenience of public judgment.And honestly, who can blame them?
In the age of AI, mass layoffs and endless “efficiency” cuts, maybe even billionaires realise it looks slightly insane to spend $80 million on a painting while warehouse workers are fighting over unpaid wages.
But hey.
Bezos could always store the art in one of his fulfilment centres.
Think of it as employee motivation:
“Scan fast enough and maybe you’ll catch a glimpse of a Rothko.”Even better — fire another thousand employees, turn the empty office buildings into private galleries, and organise silent viewings of all that silent wealth.
Beautiful.
Minimalist.
Very contemporary.
Let’s be real: without billionaires, the art market would probably lose both its charm and half of its ridiculous price tags.
But let’s not confuse that with supporting the art world.
Most of the time, they’re not saving artists.
They’re saving Sotheby’s and Christie’s quarterly reports.
And since taxing billionaires properly is apparently still too radical for certain politicians — hi, Donald — maybe their “love for art” could at least pay for something useful.
You want to collect in secret?
Great.
Buy whatever you want.
Hide it in a freeport.
Hang it in a private dining room.
Never let another human see it again.
Just pay a public fee that goes directly into culture — museums, grants, public art, young artists, art education.
Something for the people who will never get past your velvet ropes.
Because this isn’t really about privacy.
It’s about camouflage.
Spending millions on luxury while the system around you is burning simply looks better when no one is watching.
And apparently, that’s what private auctions are for.
...your worst artist and best friend,
hEhe and my contemporary art criticism
Next Article